Discussion audit
- Due Mar 18, 2016 by 11:59pm
- Points 15
- Submitting a file upload
- File Types doc, pdf, and docx
Halfway through the semester, students will review and analyze their discussion posts, including posts through class 8. Due March 17. 15%
- Begin by compiling and reading all of your posts. As you reread them, take notes, critically reading your entries as if they were written by somebody else—or at the very least, recognizing that they were written by a different you at a different time. Include this compilation in your submission.
- Compose a two-page response that analyzes and reflects on your posts. This response is open-ended and the exact content is up to you, although it should be thoughtful and directed. You should quote briefly from your own posts and refer to specific ideas from the readings we have studied so far.
- Questions to consider include but are not limited to: What do you usually write about in your posts? Are there broad themes or specific concerns that reoccur in your writing? Has the nature of your posts changed since the start of the course? What changes do you notice, and how might you account for those changes? What surprised you as you reread your work? What ideas or threads in your posts do you see as worth revisiting? What else do you notice? What aspects of the discussion posts do you value most, and how does it show up in your work?
Rubric
Please include a title
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|
Argument/proposal
A
Original, interesting, and nuanced. Well-chosen language. Clear argument.
B
Promising, if somewhat vague, obvious, overstated. May be too general or broad.
C
Flawed by weak logic, simplicity, or pointlessness. Fatally general, broad, or obvious.
D-F
Absent or unfounded. Unrelated to the assignment. Glib or thoughtless.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
||
Evidence
A
Ample, well integrated, thoughtfully interpreted, appropriate. Sources cited appropriately.
B
Adequate. May be clumsily or superficially analyzed or interpreted. May be inappropriate. Some sources not cited.
C
Inadequate or extraneous. May be carelessly chosen or poorly explained. Too much summary or too little analysis. Problems with citing sources.
D-F
Almost none. Inappropriate or misinterpreted. Sources not cited.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
||
Structure
A
Logical, graceful, progressive. Good transitions; well balanced, coherent. Starts fast and grabs the reader. Concludes without simply summarizing. Considers the reader.
B
Coherent and easily followed. May be repetitive, imbalanced, or have weak transitions. Starts slowly. Conclusion only summarizes the paper.
C
Serious gaps or leaps in logic. Monotonous or repetitive. Disorganized; Does not consider the reader. Extraneous ideas or connections.
D-F
Formless, rushed, scattered. Lacks necessary transitions. No apparent organization.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
||
Style
A
Succinct, eloquent, precise. Well-chosen language. Variable sentence types. Apt and subtle diction.
B
Correct but may be clichéd or lack eloquence or precision. A few errors in grammar and usage. Repetitive language or sentence structure. May be wordy.
C
Marred by cliché or error, poor diction, or inappropriate word choice. Poorly proofread. Little variety in language or sentence structure. Often wordy.
D-F
Sloppy. Numerous errors in spelling and/or grammar. Not proofread. Wordy.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
||
Total Points:
40
out of 40
|