CEE_4984
Project 1 Resilience Op-Ed
Skip To Content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • My Dashboard
  • CEE_4984
  • Assignments
  • Project 1 Resilience Op-Ed
2016 Fall
  • Home
  • Assignments
  • Pages
  • Files
  • Syllabus
  • Quizzes
  • Modules
  • Collaborations
  • Smart Search
  • Class Notebook
  • Portfolium
  • Google Drive
  • Microsoft OneDrive
  • Top Hat
  • VT Library Help
  • Zoom
  • Course Gallery
  • Gradescope
  • Course Evaluations

Project 1 Resilience Op-Ed

  • Due Sep 26, 2016 by 11:59pm
  • Points 40
  • Submitting a file upload

Write an op-ed on why we need more resilient infrastructure. The specific topic should be pertinent to current events and also something you are interested in. Your arguments will be much more convincing if you truly care about the topic.

The purpose of an op-ed is to convince others of your opinion; however, it cannot be entirely opinion. Your argument must be supported by factual information. 

Requirements:

  • Your op-ed should be no more than 750 words. Try to stick around 500-600 (this is very difficult to do). 
  • Your writing must be below a 12th grade reading level based on the gunning-fox index score Links to an external site.. Please submit your gunning-fox score, your op-ed.
  • Here is an additional resources for how to write an op-ed Links to an external site. Download how to write an op-ed Links to an external site. Links to an external site.
    . You should also use the rubric below.

Rubric 

Section Description Grading Criteria
Lead In This is the introduction section of your op-ed.
9-10 points - Entices me to keep reading the full story. Answers who, what, when, where of your topic. 
7-8 points - Somewhat enticing. Answers more than one but not all who, what, when, where of your topic. 
< 6 points - Boring. Answers one who, what, when, where of your topic. 
Conclusion This is the “why care” part of your op-ed. Yes, its out of place based on other writing approaches.
9-10 points - The op-ed persuaded you to care more about the topic than before.
7-8 points - Persuasive but your are not completely sold on their view point. You still have questions.
<6 points - Not persuasive, lacks impact. 
Evidence  Longest section of op-ed. Provides examples, expert statements, polices, etc..
9-10 points - Easy to understand (no jargon!). Provides supporting evidence with examples. 
7-8 points - Somewhat complicated. Examples are provided.
<6 points - Confusing and lacks examples. 
Walk-off This is where you tell the reader where to go or what to do. 

9-10 points - Offers an actionable solution to the problem address in the Lead in. 

7-8 points - Offers a solution but not actionable and lacks clarity. 

<6 points - No solution provided.

 

 

1474948799 09/26/2016 11:59pm
Please include a description
Additional Comments:
Rating max score to > pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

Find Rubric
Please include a title
Find a Rubric Links to an external site.
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Links to an external site.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 5 out of 5
Previous
Next

Previous Module:
Strategies for Success
Project 2 Bright Spots