CEE_4984
Project 3.2 Flow
Skip To Content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • My Dashboard
  • CEE_4984
  • Assignments
  • Project 3.2 Flow
2016 Fall
  • Home
  • Assignments
  • Pages
  • Files
  • Syllabus
  • Quizzes
  • Modules
  • Collaborations
  • Smart Search
  • Class Notebook
  • Portfolium
  • Google Drive
  • Microsoft OneDrive
  • Top Hat
  • VT Library Help
  • Zoom
  • Course Gallery
  • Gradescope
  • Course Evaluations

Project 3.2 Flow

  • Due Dec 7, 2016 by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Consuming is never as rewarding as creating.

Your final project will be evaluated based on the evaluation criteria described in the grading matrix below and on effort (e.g. hours spent). Please submit the following electronically here:

  • Deliverables for your project (drawings, word files, ppt., etc...).
  • A bulleted list showing how you ended up spending your time on this project (I realize this may not match what you proposed).
  • Your own self-assessment, based on the matrix below. It will count for 50% of your grade for this part of the project.

Assessment 

Points

Format and References

Vision of Final Product

Schedule

< 75

Does not follow the instructions provided.

Initial references also are missing or do not represent the knowledge base.

Difficult to predict and its format is not appropriate based on the project goal.

Does not indicate how and when the student’s time will be used to complete the project (not clear).

76-85

Correct, but not complete.

Initial references provide an adequate knowledge base but are not presented in a consistent format.

Clear but some issues/concerns have not been considered and the format is incorrect based on the project goal.

An indication of how and when the student’s time will be used to complete the project, but it will be difficult to accomplish during this semester (not realistic).

86-95

Correct and complete.

Initial references provide an adequate knowledge base and are presented in a consistent format.

Effective because issues/concerns have been analyzed and the format is appropriate.

An indication of how and when the student’s time will be used to successfully complete the project within this semester.

96-100

Comprehensive, correct and provides new information. 

Preliminary references provide a comprehensive knowledge base.

Effective and challenging because issues/concerns have been analyzed and the format has the potential to be of exceptional quality.

Clear indication of how and when the student’s time will be used to complete the project within this semester.

 

    1481173140 12/07/2016 11:59pm
    Please include a description
    Additional Comments:
    Rating max score to > pts
    Please include a rating title

    Rubric

    Find Rubric
    Please include a title
    Find a Rubric
    Title
    You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
         
    Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
    Title
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
    threshold: 5 pts
    Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
    5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
    0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
    This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
    pts
      / 5 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
    threshold: 5 pts
    Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
    5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
    0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
    This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
    pts
      / 5 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    Total Points: 5 out of 5
    Previous

    Project 3.1 Flow Proposal