Optional Participation Self-Assessment

  • Due Nov 30, 2018 at 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Available Nov 26, 2018 at 12am - Dec 3, 2018 at 11:59pm
This assignment is part of the module Project Module 11: Participation Self-Assessment (Week of November 26) and hasn't been unlocked yet.

Completion Prerequisites

The following requirements need to be completed before this page will be unlocked:

    Rubric

    Participation Rubric
    Participation Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    Timeliness
    threshold: pts
    Edit criterion description
    20 pts Excellent Reads and replies to Daily Discussion Posts as they are published (e.g., reads #TuesdayTutorial on Tuesday).
    15 pts Average Reads and replies to Daily Discussion Posts inconsistently, sometimes on the day they are published and other times several days later.
    10 pts Poor Waits until the last day of the grace period to read and reply to Daily Discussion Posts.
    0 pts Unacceptable No information on timeliness presented.
    pts
    20 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    Collaboration
    threshold: pts
    Edit criterion description
    20 pts Excellent Actively engages in discussion with others who reply to Daily Discussion Posts. Participation resembles a conversation, rather than unconnected posts.
    15 pts Average Sometimes engages in discussion with others who reply to Daily Discussion Posts, but many times does not.
    10 pts Poor Rarely or never engages others in discussion. Posts own thoughts with little connection to what others have to say about the Daily Discussion Posts.
    0 pts Unacceptable No information on collaboration presented.
    pts
    20 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    Significance to the discussion
    threshold: pts
    Edit criterion description
    20 pts Excellent Replies consistently make insightful comments, ask thought-provoking questions, and contribute significantly to the discussion.
    15 pts Average Replies are sometimes insightful or thought provoking, but at other times are general or not fully explored.
    10 pts Poor Replies are the bare minimum and do not add to the discussion. They may repeat ideas that have already been made or consist of simply agreeing with previous replies.
    0 pts Unacceptable No information on significance to the discussion included.
    pts
    20 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    Synthesis of course ideas
    threshold: pts
    Edit criterion description
    20 pts Excellent Connects ideas in replies to other course readings (either from the textbook or from other Daily Discussion Posts) on a consistent basis. Goes beyond repeating ideas to synthesizing information from multiple sources.
    15 pts Average Sometimes connects ideas in replies to other course readings (either from the textbook or from other Daily Discussion Posts).
    10 pts Poor Rarely or never connects ideas in replies to other course readings.
    0 pts Unacceptable No information on synthesis of course ideas included.
    pts
    20 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    Appropriate, professional tone
    threshold: pts
    Edit criterion description
    20 pts Excellent Always offers positive and supportive comments, maintaining respect for everyone in the discussion.
    15 pts Average Usually offers positive and supportive comments, maintaining respect for most participants in the discussion.
    10 pts Poor Offers negative comments and/or does not contribute to the learning environment.
    0 pts Unacceptable No information on appropriate, professional tone included.
    pts
    20 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    Total Points: 100 out of 100