The goals of this assignment are:
• To analyze the bases for our conceptions of the future;
• To develop a cogent, while alterable, understanding of what being human means;
• To provide evidence for well-reasoned conclusions regarding how science and technology might, and perhaps should, shape us and shape our fundamental understanding of what it means to be human.
For this assignment, please choose whether to take an exam or develop a writing project.
On carefully reading the assignment, and considering your learning goals, please let me know, in an email to me (firstname.lastname@example.org) by midnight on Tuesday, February 6, whether you have decided to write an essay or take an exam. Given how quickly the term passes, and the desire of your instructor to plan appropriately, choose wisely. Your decision is final.
Exam questions will be based on any and all of:
• The primary course readings (the readings assigned for class, not the recommended materials);
• The postings to the question forums and keywords and phrases page;
• The class presentations by groups;
• The class discussions;
• The exam questions you propose.
You are responsible for the primary readings, postings to the question forums and keywords and phrases page, class presentations by groups, and class discussions listed on the calendar from January 23 to March 1.
In an email to me (email@example.com), by no later than noon on Friday, March 16, please provide three to five questions that you would like to answer on the exam. Using my discretion I may, or may not, use the questions in whole, or in part, on the exam.
I will send you the exam by email on noon on Sunday, March 18. The exam is open book, browser and notes. You will limit each answer to 1000 words (2000 words total). You may cite sources (use MLA citation style). You have 60 hours to complete the exam, no longer.
Please send me your exam as an e-mail (firstname.lastname@example.org) document (.docx .doc or .pdf) attachment no later than midnight March 20.
Essays belong to a literary species whose extreme variability can be studied most effectively within a three-poled frame of reference. There is the pole of the personal and the autobiographical; there is the pole of the objective, the factual, the concrete particular; and there is the pole of the abstract-universal. Most essayists are at home and at their best in the neighborhood of only one of the essay's three poles, or at the most only in the neighborhood of two of them. There are the predominantly personal essayists, who write fragments of reflective autobiography and who look at the world through the keyhole of anecdote and description. There are the predominantly objective essayists who do not speak directly of themselves, but turn their attention outward to some literary or scientific or political theme. Their art consists in setting forth, passing judgment upon, and drawing general conclusions from, the relevant data. In a third group we find those essayists who do their work in the world of high abstractions, who never condescend to be personal and who hardly deign to take notice of the particular facts, from which their generalizations were originally drawn. Each kind of essay has its special merits and defects ... The most richly satisfying essays are those which make the best not of one, not of two, but of all the three worlds in which it is possible for the essay to exist. Freely, effortlessly, thought and feeling move in these consummate works of art, hither and thither between the essay's three poles — from the personal to the universal, from the abstract back to the concrete, from the objective datum to the inner experience. The perfection of any artistic form is rarely achieved by its first inventor. — Aldous Huxley
To take up Huxley's closing sentiment, and if you will indulge my reference to Wikipedia, I understand the essay as a 'try', 'trial' or 'attempt' to put thoughts into writing using prose. Our attempts will take different forms and will occur at different points in the writing process. Our goal will be to travel to, to inhabit and to integrate the "three worlds in which it is possible for the essay to exist" — the personal, the objective and the abstract. Given Huxley's formulation, an issue we might address in considering, developing and performing our essays is how, in terms of method, evidence and logic, we move (freely) from the personal, to the objective, to the abstract.
I see the essay as a relatively short piece, between 1750 and 2000 words. However, in the digital age, and given that you will post your essay to a page on our Canvas site, you may use multi-media to supplement your prose.
The essays may take any form that helps you attain your learning goals — for example, an academic essay (the traditional course "paper"), a conference presentation, a book review essay, a bibliographic essay, a dialogue, or a less traditional genre. Again, I am happy to consider multi-media (e.g., audio, video, image-based) essays.
Ultimately the essay you write must have a clearly defined connection to the ideas and concepts raised in the course. If appropriate, I would like you to incorporate in your essay references to the question forums, keywords and phrases, or the class presentations.
If you choose to write the essay, please send me a concise, 500 words or so, e-mail (email@example.com) by midnight on Tuesday, February 6 that includes the following:
• The form, or genre, the piece will take;
• The central research question you will pose and will explore;
• A brief description of the problem you have formulated that specifies the object of your inquiry;
• A brief synopsis of the argument that you plan to make;
• A preliminary list of selected central resources you may use.
On receiving your e-mail, I will schedule a time to speak with you. Your e-mail will provide the basis for our conversation. As you continue to develop the draft, I am happy to speak with you at any time.
• Due: Please post the essay to the appropriate page on our Canvas site by midnight on Tuesday, March 20;
• Length: 1750 to 2000 words;
• Citation Style: MLA.