Recommendation Report
- Due No Due Date
- Points 1
- Submitting a file upload
- File Types pdf
0
Rubric

Please include a title
Keep in mind that 20 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Recommendation Report Rubric
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Letter of Transmittal
_9545
Correctly formatted letter or memo addressed to the specific person who can decide whether to implement the recommendations. The message focuses on the big picture, providing the key information from the report, It includes everything needed to determine whether to read the full report.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Correctly formatted & addressed correspondence that thoroughly explains the key information with insightful and specific details that encourage the reader to engage with the full report.
_2179
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Correctly formatted & addressed correspondence that summarizes the key information needed to decide whether to read the full report.
_2643
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost There
Generally follows the correspondence format and is addressed to someone in the organization, but may be missing minor elements such as a complete address block or a clear subject line. The summary of key information is somewhat rushed or incomplete.
_593
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work
Has major errors in the correspondence format, is addressed incorrectly or vaguely, or does not focus on the big picture. The content is disorganized or missing critical information needed for decision-making.
_8519
1
to >0 pts
Missing or Incomplete
No letter or memo is submitted, or the submission does not fulfill the basic requirements for format, audience, or purpose.
_1506
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Title Page
_3505
Includes a specific title, information on whom the report has been prepared for and on who has prepared the report. The report title clearly indicates the subject and scope of the report.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Includes a specific title, prepared for and prepared by details, and an accurate date. the report. The title is specific and informative, precisely capturing the subject and scope of the report.
_1231
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Includes a specific title, prepared for and prepared by details, and an accurate date. Title fully reflects the subject and scope of the report.
_2801
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost There
May have a vague or overly broad title, or is missing minor details. Alternatively, includes unnecessary information and/or minor formatting errors.
_2087
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work
Has major issues: the title is unclear or generic, and/or important identifying information (such as the preparer or intended audience) is missing or incorrect.
_4531
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Abstract
_9282
Provides a concise summary of the report for a technical audience, in no more than 200 words.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Summarizes all key aspects of the report in no more than 200 words. Tailored precisely for a technical audience, demonstrating excellent control of language and focus. Exceptionally clear, concise, and engaging.
_2089
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Summarizes the report’s purpose, methods, findings, conclusions, and recommendations concisely and clearly, staying within the 200-word limit. Fully appropriate for a technical audience.
_4912
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Addresses the main points of the report but may be slightly too long or short, or may use language that is only somewhat appropriate for a technical audience.
_8360
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Is unclear, disorganized, incomplete, significantly outside the word limit, or uses language that is inappropriate for a technical audience. Key information may be missing or confusing.
_692
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Table of Contents & List of Figures and Tables
_3492
Lists all sections, headings, and subheadings in the report with accurate page numbers. If there are more than three figures and/or tables in the report, includes a list of figures and tables listing the specific name of each figure and table and the page that each appears on.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Lists all headings and subheadings with accurate page numbers. Complete, clear, and properly formatted. If applicable, the list of figures and tables is complete, correctly titled, and perfectly formatted. Overall, Comprehensive and polished.
_5102
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Correctly lists all headings and subheadings with accurate page numbers. If required, the list of figures and tables is included with correct titles and page numbers.
_9843
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Includes table of contents and (if relevant) list of figures and tables, but may be missing a few headings, subheadings, or figures/tables, or may have some minor errors in page numbering or titles.
_5008
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
May be missing headings or subheadings, page numbers. List of figures may be missing altogether or may not list all figures and tables.
_5297
1
to >0 pts
Missing or Incomplete
No table of contents submitted. No list of figures and tables submitted.
_8537
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Executive Summary
_446
Summarizes background, findings, implications, and recommendations for managers, providing the details they will need to implement the report’s recommendations.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Is exceptionally well-organized and clearly presents the background, findings, implications, and recommendations in a highly concise, engaging, and actionable format. It fully equips managers to implement the report’s recommendations.
_2037
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Clearly and accurately summarizes the background, findings, implications, and recommendations, giving managers all the information they need to act.
_6425
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Covers most major components but may briefly or unclearly address one area, making it less useful for managers.
_7434
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Is missing multiple major components. It is unclear, disorganized, or too vague to guide management decision-making effectively. It may not address the needs of management.
_9973
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction
_682
Covers the subject and purpose of the report, provides background information, explains the sources for information in the report, defines the scope of the report, states the most significant findings and the recommendation(s). It explains the organization of the report and mentions any key terms that will be new to readers.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Thorough, engaging, and exceptionally well-organized. It fully addresses the subject, purpose, background, sources, scope, key findings, recommendations, organization, and key terms, while providing excellent clarity and flow.
_9902
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Clearly covers the subject, purpose, background, sources, scope, key findings, recommendations, organization of the report, and defines any necessary key terms, with no omissions or errors.
_2372
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Addresses most of the required elements but may omit or briefly cover one or two, leading to minor gaps in the reader’s understanding.
_4052
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Is missing multiple major elements or unclearly presents the report’s purpose and structure.
_3142
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Methods
_6529
Answers the question, “What did you do?” by describing how you conducted your research. It provides enough information for readers to understand what you did and why you did it that way. Provide enough detail for someone else to duplicate your methods.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Provides a highly detailed, clear, and replicable description of both primary and secondary research activities. Directly and completely explains the research and how it was conducted.
_4082
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Clearly describes all primary and secondary research methods with enough detail for replication.
_500
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Describes research activities but omits minor steps or lacks full clarity.
_2378
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Major steps are missing or unclear; research methods are confusing or incomplete.
_1580
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Results
_8507
Answers the question, “What did you see or determine?” by presenting the data your discovered or compiled. It reports the data you discovered or compiled, presenting the information objectively, without comment or interpretation.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Presents findings with exceptional clarity, logical organization, and strong use of headings or visuals; no interpretation included.
_3580
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents findings clearly, logically, and objectively with no interpretation mixed in.
_3401
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Presents findings but may include minor disorganization or occasional interpretation.
_2376
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Findings are incomplete, disorganized, or mixed with personal commentary.
_6885
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusions
_233
Answers the question, “What does it mean?” by explaining the implications of the results. It presents the implications of the results.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Draws insightful, well-supported conclusions that are strongly connected to results and implications.
_7758
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Clearly explains the implications of the results with direct connections to findings.
_5959
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Explains conclusions but with some gaps in logic, clarity, or connection to results.
_5835
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Conclusions are weak, unsupported, or disconnected from the results.
_1798
1
to >0 pts
Missing or Incomplete
No conclusions submitted or conclusions are not supported.
_7872
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Recommendations
_3096
Answers the question, “What should we do?” by outlining the possible actions that the company or organization can take, evaluating the effectiveness of each. Provides specific, actionable advice based on the conclusions section.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Provides clear, practical, highly actionable recommendations that are thoroughly evaluated against alternatives. Provides strong argument for the recommended options.
_9754
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Outlines specific, actionable recommendations directly supported by the conclusions and evaluates options effectively.
_6314
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Recommendations are present but vague, generic, or not strongly tied to conclusions.
_9073
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Recommendations are unclear, impractical, or not connected to conclusions.
_1207
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
References/Documentation
_4100
In-text and bibliography citations are included, using a consistent bibliographic format. The bibliography is on a separate page (titled Works Cited or References depending on your citation style selection).
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
All citations are flawlessly formatted both in-text and in the bibliography; consistently professional style throughout.
_793
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
All sources are correctly cited both in-text and in the bibliography using a consistent citation format.
_3244
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Sources are cited but with minor errors or inconsistencies in format.
_5645
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Citations are inconsistent, missing, or improperly formatted.
_5964
1
to >0 pts
Missing or Incomplete
No citations or bibliography provided.
_5507
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Appendices
_3161
Well-labeled appendices that clearly support and supplement report content. Each appendix begins on a new page and includes a specific title in addition to the appendix label (e.g., Appendix A, Appendix B). If there is only one appendix, the alphabet letter is not included.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Appendices are well-organized, thoroughly labeled, perfectly formatted, and strongly enhance the report. They are referenced directly in the body of the report.
_6798
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Appendices are correctly labeled, titled, organized logically, and directly support the report content. They are referenced in the body of the report.
_9208
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Appendices are included but may have minor labeling, organization, or clarity issues.
_320
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Appendices are poorly organized, mislabeled, or unclear. They may not be referenced or explained in the body of the report.
_6856
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professional Design and Formatting
_6176
Polished, professional layout with headings and subheadings, visuals, and easy navigation. The document design and formatting should do the following: (1) Makes information easy for readers to find and read. (2) Emphasizes important information. (3) Makes a good first impression as a polished, professional document. (4) Uses well-integrated and well-designed visuals to clarify the information.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Document design is exceptionally polished, with outstanding clarity, consistent headings, excellent visual integration, and ease of navigation. Images, graphics, and other visual elements add expert details and clarity to the report.
_9864
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Professionally formatted with clear headings, good visuals, and logical organization that supports navigation. Images, graphics, and charts are well integrated.
_1936
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Mostly professional but has minor inconsistencies in format, visuals, or structure. Occasional images or charts are not integrated appropriately.
_1997
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Difficult to navigate, missing clear headings or visual organization or integration. Visuals may be missing.
_7620
1
to >0 pts
Missing or Incomplete
Document lacks professional formatting or clear layout.
_8803
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Originality
_3148
Work is original and fully credits all sources.
threshold:
pts
|
5
to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Work is completely original, thoughtfully developed, and citations are flawlessly integrated.
_9601
4
to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Work is fully original with all sources properly cited.
_5407
3
to >2.0 pts
Almost Meets Expectations
Minor originality or citation issues are present but intent to credit sources is clear.
_6422
2
to >1.0 pts
Needs Work to Meet Expectations
Major originality or citation issues exist; improper credit given.
_4630
1
to >0 pts
Missing or Incomplete
Work is plagiarized or largely copied without attribution.
_6725
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Description of criterion
threshold:
5 pts
|
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
Total Points:
70
out of 70
Additional Comments:
Rubric

Please include a title
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Description of criterion
threshold:
5 pts
|
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Description of criterion
threshold:
5 pts
|
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
Total Points:
5
out of 5