This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeets Assignment Basic Expectations_1666
My project meets the basic expectations of the assignment: (1) It revises an existing piece of user documentation that someone in my intended career would use and that meets the Website Criteria included in the assignment. (2) It includes a Reflection Memo that explains the changes I made in the user documentation revision. (3) It has been submitted as a PDF with the layout and formatting
The document thoroughly revises a relevant piece of user documentation that someone in my intended career field would use. It meets all of the website criteria. The project also includes a well-structured reflection memo. The project has been submitted as a PDF that shows the layout and formatting accurately.
The document meets the core requirements of the assignment, including an appropriate user documentation revision and a reflection memo. The project has been submitted as a PDF that shows the layout and formatting accurately.
The document includes the necessary revision and reflection memo. The user documentation is generally acceptable, but it’s not clear that someone in the intended career field would use it. The webpage does not meet the Website Criteria.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevises All 6 Areas of User Documentation_1653
My user documentation revision addresses all the required areas: (1) Plain Language (Writing), (2) Document Design, (3) Length, (4) Ethical Considerations, (5) Legal Considerations, and (6) Cultural Considerations
The revision thoughtfully integrates principles of plain language, document design, length, and ethical, legal, and cultural considerations, demonstrating strong attention to detail and user needs.
The revision does not fully address multiple areas. It does not address plain language, document design, ethical, legal, or cultural considerations, or the needs of intercultural audiences.
The revision does not account for the required areas or lacks depth in its approach. The original version of the user documentation is not linked to, so comparison of the revision is not possible.
_1784
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollows Reflection Memo Format & Design_4358
My reflection memo begins with required memo headers and uses a clear and specific subject line. It uses standard memo format and document design, with appropriate spacing, headings, and page numbers.
The memo format is not accurate. The memo does not use appropriate line spacing. Page numbers are missing. Headings do not show adequate contrast from the rest of the text.
The memo does not fully adhere to the expected format, with missing or unclear headers and subject lines. The memo does not use appropriate line spacing. Page numbers are missing. Headings do not show adequate contrast from the rest of the text.
The required memo elements are missing. The document is not a memo. The document is missing memo headers. The memo does not include headings or expected sections. The document includes a closing, which is not appropriate for memo format.
_4071
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduces the Reflection Memo Effectively_1405
My reflection memo introduces the user documentation, providing a link to the original version (or attaching a copy), and ending with a purpose statement.
The memo provides a clear, engaging introduction, including a working link to the original documentation and a concise, well-crafted purpose statement.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes All 4 Reflection Memo Sections_6590
My reflection memo includes the following sections, with appropriate headings, explanations (including references to readings and related footnote documentation), and examples to show the improvements I’ve made: (1) Plain Language Revision, (2) Redesign, (3) Ethical, Legal, and Cultural Considerations, and (4) Rhetorical Analysis.
The memo is well-organized with clearly labeled sections that provide thorough explanations and concrete examples. The memo masterfully demonstrates the improvements to the original documentation.
All required sections are present and sufficiently explained. Headings are present and show clear contrast with the rest of the text. Examples from the original and revised documentation show the improvements to the documentation.
The memo does not fully develop multiple sections, making it difficult to understand the rationale behind the changes. Examples are missing or described only. The memo does not show the improvements to the documentation.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConcludes Reflection Memo with Summary & Contact Info_4615
My reflection memo ends with a conclusion that reviews my evaluation of the original document, summarizes how my changes have improved the document, and provides contact information.
Find Rubric
